English French German Italian Portuguese Russian Spanish
Planning Your Evaluation Evaluation Life Cycle

Evaluation Life Cycle

Project Evaluation Cycle

Evaluation should not be considered a stand-alone activity. It should rather be thought of as a set of linked tasks that are undertaken from the start to the end (and beyond) of a project. This is diagrammatically represented in the project evaluation cycle below.


Project evaluation cycle

Source: Project evaluation cycle adapted from TORQAID Project Management Cycle


Monitoring and Evaluation Data Cycle

Just as there is a project management and project evaluation cycle, Willetts & Crawford (2007) have put forward a monitoring and evaluation data cycle that broadly outlines steps to identify, collect, analyse and use the data.

The monitoring & evaluation data cycle considers the process as having 6 stages (Willetts & Crawford, 2007: 368-369), as represented in the diagram below.

Monitoring and evaluation data cycle

Monitoring and evaluation data cycle

Source: Willetts & Crawford (2007)

The stages in the data cycle are explained below:

  1. Identification is the selection of the data required to achieve the purpose of M&E. This can be through defining indicators.
  2. Capture of the identified data. This can involve formal and informal ‘methods of enquiry’, and various stakeholders.
  3. Analysis of the raw captured data in order to draw out meaningful features and trends. Unless data are subject to some form of analysis, their capture represents a waste of time and resources.
  4. Dissemination of the M&E findings (analysed data) by various mechanisms to stakeholders. It is important to ensure that the information is relevant to the recipient, and is received in a timely and accessible format.
  5. Use of the M&E findings by the various stakeholders. Utilisation is embodied in the broad purpose of M&E: to promote learning and accountability. If the use of the data is not known from the outset, it is possible that it may remain unused, which would be a waste of time and resources.
  6. Assessment and reflection about whether the data identified in the first stage, having been captured and been put to use, has demonstrably contributed to improved learning and accountability. This is in essence an evaluation of the M&E system, and provides a means to make a judgement on what improvements can be made to the evaluation program.


Donate Now

Please make a donation to upgrade the Evaluation Toolbox.

The Evaluation Toolbox is maintained by Damien Sweeney and Martin Pritchard from PREA as their in-kind contribution back to the community. The Toolbox now needs several weeks of work to review and upgrade all the contents and add new content for you. Work has begun and we are seeking your donation (big or small) to help support this major upgrade. Email us to indicate what you want to be included in the Toolbox.

case study

What is the Toolbox?

The toolbox aims to provide a one-stop-site for the evaluation of community sustainability engagement projects that aim to change household behaviours. Through the toolbox you can learn how to conduct your own evaluation of a behaviour change project using the guides and templates provided.

see more...

Why Evaluate?

Conducting an evaluation is considered good practice in managing a project.

The monitoring phase of project evaluation allows us to track progress and identify issues early during implementation, thus providing and opportunity to take corrective action or make proactive improvements as required.

see more...


City of Whitehorse City of Whitehorse